A DAC converts digital audio into an analogue signal that an amplifier can work with, and without one you cannot hear any digital source at all. The question is not whether you need a DAC. It is whether the one you are using is any good.
For most people who care about sound quality, the answer is that it probably is not, and that a separate external DAC is one of the most effective upgrades available to anyone listening to digital music through a decent system.
What a DAC actually does
Digital audio stores music as a stream of numbers, samples taken thousands of times per second that represent the shape of the original sound wave. A CD samples at 44,100 times per second. High resolution files sample at 96,000 or 192,000 times per second. Each sample is a number, and those numbers need to be converted back into a continuous electrical signal before they become music you can hear. The Digital to Analogue Converter does that conversion.
The mathematics involved are not complicated in principle. The practical challenge is doing the conversion accurately and quietly in the real world, where power supply noise, interference from nearby components and the quality of the conversion circuit itself all affect the result. Do it well and digital audio sounds open, detailed and natural. Do it poorly and it sounds compressed, flat or fatiguing in the way that makes you reach for the volume control rather than a second record.
Most built-in DACs, the ones in phones, laptops and cheap streamers, are done quickly with components chosen for cost rather than performance. The conversion chip shares a power supply with the rest of the device, which introduces noise. The output stage is minimal. The result is adequate for casual listening and genuinely poor for anything more serious.
Where you are most likely already using a DAC badly
If you are streaming music through a laptop or phone into an amplifier, the DAC in that device is handling the conversion. This is usually the weakest point in an otherwise reasonable system. A decent amplifier and a pair of good speakers will faithfully reproduce whatever the laptop DAC gives them, including all its limitations.
If you use a smart TV as a source, the same applies. Television manufacturers do not put serious audio components into their sets because their customers are not asking for them. The optical or headphone output from a smart TV carries a signal that a separate DAC can improve substantially.
Streaming devices are more variable. Some, particularly at the higher end, include genuinely capable DAC circuits. Others are essentially a computer on a stick with an audio chip that was never designed for critical listening. The way to find out which you have is to bypass the built-in DAC using the digital output and compare it with a separate unit. The difference is usually immediate and obvious.
What a separate DAC actually gives you
A dedicated external DAC has one job, and the manufacturer can spend the entire budget on doing that one job well. The conversion chip is a better component. The power supply is designed specifically for low-noise audio operation rather than shared with processors, screens and wireless radios. The output stage is engineered to drive a real interconnect cable into a real amplifier input rather than an internal circuit board trace.
The result tends to show up in a few consistent ways. The background gets quieter, the space from which music emerges feels darker and more defined. High frequencies that were slightly harsh or gritty become smoother and more natural. Voices and acoustic instruments gain a presence and realism that is genuinely easier to listen to. And the detail in the recording becomes more accessible, not because more information has been added, but because less of it was being masked by conversion noise.
None of this is guaranteed. A cheap external DAC into a poor amplifier will not sound better than a decent built in DAC in a good streamer. The improvement a separate DAC brings depends on the quality of what you are replacing and the quality of what you are adding. But in a system with a capable amplifier and speakers, a good external DAC is one of the most consistent and audible upgrades available.
Connections: what to know before you buy
A DAC needs a digital input from your source and an analogue output to your amplifier. The digital connection is where most of the questions come from.
USB is the most common way to connect a computer or laptop to a DAC. Most modern DACs accept USB audio and the conversion happens in the DAC rather than the computer, which is the whole point. USB audio quality depends heavily on the DAC's own USB implementation, and better DACs include galvanic isolation that prevents electrical noise from the computer travelling down the cable alongside the audio signal.
Optical, also called TOSLINK, uses a fibre optic cable to carry the digital signal. Because it is optical rather than electrical, it provides natural isolation from ground loops and electrical interference. The limitation is that optical cannot carry high resolution audio above a certain sample rate, typically 96kHz, due to bandwidth constraints in the TOSLINK standard. For standard CD quality or streaming audio it is entirely adequate and often preferable to a poorly implemented electrical connection.
Coaxial digital uses a standard RCA cable to carry the digital signal electrically. It can handle higher sample rates than optical and is the preferred connection for many audiophile applications. The cable quality matters more than with optical because electrical connections are susceptible to interference.
The analogue output from the DAC to the amplifier is usually via standard RCA phono connectors or, on some higher end units, balanced XLR connectors that offer better rejection of interference over longer cable runs.
What to look for when buying a DAC used
The first question is which inputs you need. If you are connecting a laptop, USB is essential. If you are connecting a CD transport or an older streamer, coaxial or optical may be the only options. Check the inputs on the unit you are considering against the outputs on your sources before buying.
Power supply quality matters more in a DAC than in almost any other component, because noise on the power supply couples directly into the conversion process. Units with a separate external power supply, or with a well engineered internal transformer, tend to be quieter than those with a simple switching supply. Some DACs accept optional upgraded power supplies as an aftermarket addition, which is worth knowing about when comparing used options.
Sample rate support is worth understanding. A DAC that supports up to 24-bit/96kHz handles everything a standard streaming service offers, including Qobuz and Apple Music Lossless at their current resolution levels. Support for 192kHz and above becomes relevant if you have high resolution downloads or use a streaming service offering that level of content, but it is not essential for most listeners.
Brands worth knowing on the used market
Chord Electronics make their DACs in the UK and use their own FPGA based conversion technology rather than off the shelf conversion chips. The Hugo, in its original and second generation forms, is one of the most significant portable DAC and headphone amplifier combinations ever made. The Qutest is the current desktop only version and a serious unit. Used Chord DACs hold their value well, which is an accurate reflection of their performance.
Naim built their DAC in 2009 and it remained in production for several years. The Naim DAC is a significant component that accepts up to eight digital inputs and performs at a level that still stands up against much more recent alternatives. Used examples are available and represent strong value for a system already built around Naim amplification, where the familiar Naim character carries through from the conversion stage.
Audiolab have made genuinely capable DACs at accessible prices for many years. The M DAC, launched in 2011, was widely regarded as a reference at its price point and used examples are easy to find. The current 8300CDQ and the standalone DAC offerings continue the same approach of serious engineering at realistic prices.
Cambridge Audio produce the DacMagic series, which has been through several iterations and consistently offers honest performance at its price. Used DacMagic units are plentiful and sensibly priced. They are not the last word in resolution but they are clean, well made and a reliable step up from a built in DAC in almost any source component.
Musical Fidelity have made several well-regarded DACs over the years, including the V DAC and the M1 DAC. Used Musical Fidelity units often appear at prices that make them very competitive with new alternatives from less established manufacturers.
Rega make the DAC-R, which unsurprisingly partners well with Rega amplification and CD players and shares the house sound of speed and rhythmic clarity that characterises the brand's other products.
The streamer with a DAC built in: is that enough?
Several current streamers include a genuinely capable DAC as part of the unit. The Naim Uniti range, the Linn Selekt DSM and the Cambridge Audio Evo series all offer this, and in each case the built in DAC is a serious component rather than an afterthought. If you are buying a streamer at this level, adding a separate DAC is unlikely to produce a dramatic improvement and may not produce any improvement at all, since the manufacturer has already addressed the conversion quality at the design stage.
The case for a separate DAC is strongest when the source is a computer, a phone, a basic streaming device or an older piece of equipment with a digital output but no serious conversion circuitry. In those cases, the external DAC is doing the conversion that the source cannot do well, and the improvement is real and consistent.
Browse our current DAC and digital source stock at 2ndhandhifi.co.uk
For the dedicated enthusiast
If you already understand the basics and want to go further, here is where DAC technology gets genuinely interesting.
Delta-sigma versus R2R ladder conversion. The vast majority of DACs use delta sigma conversion chips, in which the digital signal is oversampled to a very high rate and then converted using a one bit stream. This approach produces very low measured distortion and is manufacturable at low cost, which is why it dominates the market. R2R ladder DACs take a different approach: they use a resistor network to convert each bit of the digital word directly and simultaneously. Proponents argue that R2R conversion has a more natural and analogue like character, particularly in the way it handles the decay of sustained notes and the texture of acoustic instruments. The measurements do not always support this claim, but a significant number of experienced listeners hear a difference and prefer the R2R approach. R2R DACs include the Audio Note range and, at a more accessible price point, the Denafrips units. They are generally more expensive than delta-sigma equivalents at the same specification level.
Chord's FPGA approach. Chord Electronics, under the technical direction of Rob Watts, implement their DAC conversion using Field Programmable Gate Arrays rather than either delta sigma chips or R2R networks. The FPGA runs a proprietary filter algorithm with a very high tap count, which Watts argues produces a more accurate time domain reconstruction of the original signal. The measured performance of Chord DACs is exceptional and the subjective performance, particularly in the way transients and spatial information are resolved, is widely acknowledged as a reference at each price point in the range. The Mojo, the Hugo and the DAVE represent different levels in the hierarchy and all share the fundamental technical approach.
Jitter and reclocking. Jitter is timing error in the digital audio clock, and it produces distortion in the converted analogue signal. In a USB audio connection, the computer's clock drives the conversion process and computer clocks are inherently noisy because they share silicon with processors, memory controllers and other sources of electrical interference. Better DACs include asynchronous USB implementations in which the DAC's own low jitter clock controls the data flow rather than the computer's clock. Some also include reclocking stages that further clean the timing before conversion. The audible effect of good jitter rejection is a cleaner, more stable stereo image and reduced listening fatigue. It is one reason why an asynchronous USB DAC into a well-implemented amplifier often sounds noticeably better than a synchronous connection, even when the sample rate and bit depth are identical.
Non-oversampling DACs. A small number of manufacturers, including Audio Note and certain specialist Japanese designers, produce DACs that do not oversample the digital signal before conversion. Standard delta sigma DACs oversample the input by a large factor, which moves the quantisation noise to frequencies above the audio band where it can be filtered out. Non oversampling designs convert the signal at its original sample rate with no additional digital processing, relying on a carefully designed analogue output stage to handle the filtering instead. The argument is that the analogue filter is more benign than digital oversampling filters, which introduce phase shift and pre-ringing artefacts. Whether this is audible is genuinely contested. NOS DACs typically measure worse than oversampling equivalents on standard test signals. Some listeners strongly prefer them. If you encounter an Audio Note DAC on the used market and find its character compelling, the NOS topology is the probable reason.